Political Correctness
Ben Afflkeck comes across as a prize prat if you ask me, for trying to airbrush his slave-owning ancestor out of his family tree.
The BBC report's on the Affleck's cack-handed attempts at censorship which has made the story about him rather than his family history.
One of the NUPE branch secretaries I worked with was a chap called Reece Campbell , a physically big man form the West Indies originally, and we used to talk and laugh about the fact that one of his ancestors was a Scottish overseer whose gruff Scottish accent was mimicked and pilloried by Reece's family down the years.
Campbell being a traditional Scottish name of course.
Now Reece Campbell never had a chip on his shoulder, even though he had good reason, which makes Ben Afflect seem all the more ridiculous and pathetically politically correct.
Ben Affleck asked television producers not to reveal one of his ancestors was a slave-owner, leaked emails suggest.
The actor was taking part in a US series called Finding Your Roots, where experts research a celebrity's family history, when the discovery was made.
The broadcaster, PBS, says in a statement that they didn't censor the slave-owner details.
It is "very common" to find slave-owning ancestors during research, the show's host says.
"For any guest, we always find far more stories about ancestors on their family trees than we ever possibly could use," Prof Henry Louis Gates says in a statement sent to The Associated Press.
Wikileaks publishes Sony documents
A guide to the Sony Pictures hack
He says both film director Ken Burns and journalist Anderson Cooper also found out while making the show that relatives of theirs had owned slaves.
The details of Affleck's slave-owning family member were not included when his episode of Finding Your Roots was broadcast.
"In the case of Mr Affleck - we focused on what we felt were the most interesting aspects of his ancestry - including a Revolutionary War ancestor, a third great-grandfather who was an occult enthusiast and his mother who marched for Civil Rights during the Freedom Summer of 1964," says Prof Gates in a statement on the PBS website.
A representative for Affleck has yet to respond to request for a comment.
Earlier this year he received a People's Choice award for his humanitarian work in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
The email chain between Gates and Sony Pictures co-chairman and chief executive Michael Lynton was one of many thousands of emails and documents from last year's Sony hack that WikiLeaks put into a searchable online archive on Thursday.
"Here's my dilemma: confidentially, for the first time, one of our guests has asked us to edit out something about one of his ancestors - the fact that he owned slaves," Prof Gates wrote on 22 July 2014.
"Now, four or five of our guests this season descend from slave owners, including Ken Burns. We've never had anyone ever try to censor or edit what we found. He's a megastar. What do we do?"
Lynton replies the same day, saying: "I would take it out if no one knows, but if it gets out that you are editing the material based on this kind of sensitivity then it gets tricky. Again, all things being equal I would definitely take it out."
After further exchanges the pair seem to agree that censorship is a bad idea.
"It would embarrass him and compromise our integrity. I think he is getting very bad advice." Prof Gates writes.
"Once we open the door to censorship, we lose control of the brand."
Affleck is never referred to by name in the emails - instead he is called "megastar" or "Batman". At the time of the exchange he was filming Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice.
A PBS spokeswoman says PBS did not know of the exchanges between Prof Gates, Sony and Affleck and wasn't part of editorial decisions made by the host and his producers.
"It is clear from the exchange how seriously Professor Gates takes editorial integrity," PBS says in the statement on its website.
"The range and depth of the stories on Finding Your Roots speak for themselves."
"The range and depth of the stories on Finding Your Roots speak for themselves."
