Evading Responsibility
Oscar Pistorius is having his ludicrous 'mistake' defence torn apart in Pretoria under the forensic and fierce cross examination by prosecuting counsel, Gerrie Nel.
The argument being advanced by Pistorius is that he has done absolutely nothing wrong, in a criminal sense at least, and that he should walk free from court at the end of his trial because he is the victim of a tragic mistake.
That while he admits to killing a young woman, his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp, he did not intend to do so and somehow he did not realise that firing four high velocity 'dum dum' bullets through a bathroom door would not result in the death of anyone on the other side.
Pistorius would have the world believe that someone with a high powered handgun in his hand was so overcome with fear that he could not think straight or control himself and, as a result, he is not in any way to blame for what happened.
Now I don't believe his story for a minute because it all boils down to whether or not Oscar held a genuine belief that his life was in danger - and there is no evidence for that assertion at all.
Pistorius Trial (18 March 2014)
The trial of Oscar Pistorius is descending into farce if you ask me, as this rather spoiled and unpleasant young man argues that not only is he not guilty of murder, but that he has nothing to answer for in the killing of his girlfriend, Reeva Steenkamp.
The latest evidence demonstrates conclusively, in my opinion, that Pistorius did not have a reasonable belief that his life was under real threat when he shot four times through a locked bathroom door.
So for that reason alone I fail to see how the former athlete can be anything other than guilty as charged.
But other parts of Oscar's defence are just as ridiculous.
For example, why would Reeva Steenkamp have locked the bathroom door in the small hours of the morning when she and her boyfriend were all alone together in his house?
Another thing that doesn't make sense is why would the young woman who is in bed with her boyfriend, and asleep according to Oscar, get dressed (in a black top and white shorts) to go the the bathroom in the middle of the night?
So if you ask me, Oscar's story of what happened that night is so full of holes as to render his version of events completely unbelievable.
Pistorius trial: Police photos show traces of blood in bedroom
Gun licenser says Pistorius had sound knowledge of gun laws
By Robyn Dixon - The Chicago Tribune
JOHANNESBURG, South Africa -- Police photographs show unexplained drops of blood on the wall above the left-hand bedside table and bed headboard and on the duvet in the main bedroom of South African Olympic athlete Oscar Pistorius, according to evidence at his trial Monday.
The blood spatters appear to have been some distance from the trail of blood leading from the bathroom out into the hall, left when Pistorius carried his dying girlfriend, Reeva Steenkamp, down stairs from the bathroom where he shot her.
Pistorius has pleaded not guilty to Steenkamp’s murder. He admits to the shooting but says he mistook her for an intruder.
The prosecution has not yet called blood stain analysts to testify on blood spatter in many locations throughout the house. Ballistics experts are also yet to testify.
At his bail hearing last year, Pistorius’ affidavit said after firing through the door of an enclosed toilet, the double amputee athlete went to the bedroom, put on his prosthetic legs, ran back, broke open the door with a cricket bat and dragged the bleeding Steenkamp from the toilet. He then phoned the estate manager and an ambulance, ran downstairs and opened the front door, then went back upstairs and carried Steenkamp downstairs, the affidavit said.
The police photos also showed damage to the main bedroom door at the edge of the door above the handle, which has so far not been explained by either the prosecution or the defense. Splinters and holes were visible in the picture.
Police photographs showed that the house had an alarm system and electronic alarm beams outside, designed to sound in the case of an intruder moving around outside.
A photograph of the contents of the bedroom drawer showed condoms and a cartridge holder. A gun magazine and holster were in the drawer but removed and photographed on the bed.
Police photographer Barend van Staden detailed the timing of each photograph and when he moved objects.
The meticulous detail about the photographs followed an attack from defense attorney Barry Roux last week when he questioned the reliability of the police photographic evidence and suggested the scene may have been tampered with.
But Van Staden said he captured each scene fully as police found it, after which he took photographs as objects were moved during police investigation. For example, he photographed blood drops on the duvet and then moved the duvet to find out if there was more blood.
Sean Rens, a gun instructor and dealer who trained and tested Pistorius, testified that the athlete loved guns and ordered six from him, including a Smith & Wesson .500 revolver, often described as the most powerful handgun in production, and a Winchester defender pump-action shotgun.
The total purchase, which reportedly cost about $5,000, was canceled a month after Pistorius shot Steenkamp.
Rens said Pistorius had “a great love and enthusiasm” for guns.
Rens said part of the training involved “code red” mode or “combat” mode, when a gun holder would pull a weapon out if an intruder was in the house. He said Pistorius once told him he had gone into “combat” mode and drawn his pistol, only to find he was confronting a laundry machine.
Pistorius tweeted about the incident on Nov. 27, 2012: “Nothing like getting home to hear the washing machine on and thinking it’s an intruder to go into full combat recon mode into the pantry! waa,” he tweeted at the time. The tweet has since been removed.
Rens examined Pistorius on his knowledge of South African gun laws. Written questions in a gun safety exam required to get a gun license indicated the athlete was aware that it’s illegal to open fire on an intruder unless you can see they are armed and pose a direct threat to your life – for example coming toward you.
"Attack must be against you, it must be unlawful, it must be against a person," Pistorius wrote, answer a test question on when it was legal to use lethal force.
In another answer, he discussed the importance of accurate target identification: “Always know your target and what lies behind”.
Pistorius’ affidavit at his bail hearing said the bathroom was dark when he fired.
Pistorius also wrote in the exam that you should never fire into the air. He faces two charges of recklessly discharging a pistol, once in a crowded restaurant in 2012 and once out of the sunroof of a car in 2013. He has pleaded not guilty to both.
